Home   Federal Cases   State Cases   News   Search   Cart   Log In 
 
Search 591,299 Cases and Articles on TJV!
 
Illinois State Categories







People of State of Illinois v Gacho

Case No. 1-09-1675 (IL Dist. 1 App., Apr. 16, 2012)

The defendant, Robert Gacho, appeals from the circuit court's second-stage dismissal of his petition, filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 122-1). On appeal, the defendant argues that his petition should not have been dismissed, because it made a substantial showing that (1) he was denied a fair trial due to his trial judge's corruption; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to renew a motion to suppress his confession after witnesses testified that the confession had been physically coerced; and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney, who also represented a family member of one of the victims, labored under a conflict of interest. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the circuit court's dismissal of the defendant's corruption claim and conflict-of-interest claim and remand for further proceedings on those issues. We affirm the circuit court's dismissal of the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of murder, armed robbery, and aggravated kidnaping for his part in the killing of two men, Tullio Infelise and Aldo Fratto. The defendant was sentenced to death, and he appealed his conviction and sentence directly to the supreme court. See Ill. Const. Art. VI, § 4(b); Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 603 (eff. July 1, 1971). The supreme court affirmed the defendant's convictions but vacated his death sentence and ordered that he be resentenced. People v. Gacho, 122 Ill. 2d 221, 522 N.E.2d 1146 (1988). On remand, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for life.

The evidence at the defendant's trial was detailed in the supreme court's decision on his direct appeal. For that reason, we recount that evidence only briefly here, along with additional details to provide context for the defendant's postconviction claims.








 

 

Judge(s): Thomas Hoffman
Jurisdiction: Illinois Court of Appeals, First District
Related Categories: Criminal Justice
 
Trial Court Judge(s)
Diane Canon

 
Court of Appeals Judge(s)
Thomas Hoffman
Themis Karnezis
Mary Rochford

 
Appellant Lawyer(s) Appellant Law Firm(s)
Alan Goldberg Office of the Illinois State Appellate Defender
Michael Pelletier Office of the Illinois State Appellate Defender

 
Appellee Lawyer(s) Appellee Law Firm(s)
Anita Alvarez Office of the Cook County State's Attorney
Marie Czech Office of the Cook County State's Attorney
Alan Spellberg Office of the Cook County State's Attorney
William Toffenetti Office of the Cook County State's Attorney

 

CUSTOM EMAIL ALERTS!

With your FREE registration, you can select an unlimited number of Alert categories for daily, weekly or monthly deliveries of the Federal and State Cases most relevant
to you!

Click Here to sign up.

 



Click the maroon box above for a formatted PDF of the decision.
of proof required to convict the defendant, or which might lead him not to hold the balance nice, defendant's acquittal was unlikely to advance that aim. further, notwithstanding that point, the titone's co-defendants, including the defendant here, be found guilty. the defendant even supplied justice thomas e. hoffman, j., delivered the opinion of the court. no. 1-09-1675 n.e.2d 658 (2005). to explain why he was unable to provide this information in his petition. however, in our reading, his waiverin open court pertained to counsel's past representation of a member of the infelise family, this "new" evidence was required to present his ineffectiveness claim. the basis of his current following exchange then occurred between the defendant the trial judge, thomas maloney proceedings. defendant be found guilty. then heard several gunshots before titone and sorrentino came to her car and reported that they had 8 that police admitted having physically coerced the defendant's confession. police had "sock[ed] him good." stephanie and timothy haynes gave similar testimony. conflict of interest, and newcounsel was appointed for the defendant. on april 9, 2001, after several knewthewitnesseswoulddescribepoliceadmissions ofabuse. accordingly,weagreewith thestate are limited to those claims that were not and could not have been previously adjudicated on direct ¶ 31 first, the state responds by noting that the defendant failed to indicate the nature of trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise this issue. instead, the defendant argues that his claim is, complete v. 1991, ch. 38, par. 122-6; gaultney, 174 ill.2d at 418, 675 n.e.2d 102. dismissal of a petition at the amendedpostconviction petition in november1997. theamendedpetition statedthatit "replace[d]" stephanie haynes, went to the defendant's apartment in december 1982 and saw police there. petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing as a matter of right; rather, to warrant an deprivation of federal or state constitutional rights.” people v. tenner, 175 ill.2d 372, 378, 677 ¶ 2 after a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of murder, armed robbery, and aggravated ¶ 28 the first category of conflict, termed "per se conflicts," consist of those "certain facts *** inconsistent obligations." spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d at 13-14. illinois recognizes two classes of plaintiff-appellee, first district, first division ¶ 27 "persons accused of crime enjoy a sixth amendment right to the effective assistance of towns, 182 ill.2d 491, 503, 696 n.e.2d 1128 (1998). a petition that is not dismissed at the first or filed: april 16, 2012 accompanying affidavits. people v. coleman, 183 ill.2d 366, 381. nonspecific and nonfactual of case. robert gacho, to ask to re-open the motion to suppress. the substance of that testimony is readily apparent from appeal. for that reason, we recount that evidence only briefly here, along with additional details to effective in any attempts to steer the defendant's verdict, the fact that he had an interest in doing so but were not, are considered waived." sanders, 238 ill. 2d at 398. the state further observes that no. 1-09-1675 ¶ 26 thedefendant's finalargumentonappeal is thatthe circuit court erred in dismissinghis claim held simultaneously with the defendant's jury trial, had tendered a bribe to maloney via titone's a jury, while a co-defendant, dino titone, was tried simultaneously before maloney. provide context for the defendant's postconviction claims. defendant gacho: yes." ¶ 5 also prior to the defendant's trial, the defendant moved to suppress his written confession, engineered an unfair conviction." the state's argument misses the point. as we noted at the outset, the infelise family. presumably, counsel was motivated to maintain the family's favor, and the 102 (1996). at the first stage, the trial court must examine the petition independentlyand summarily only the absence of actual bias but also the absence of the probability of bias. hawkins, 181 ill. 2d defendant's convictions but vacated his death sentence and ordered that he be resentenced. people and were both presided over bya man the state concedes had an interest in the proceedings. further, defendant to a new trial. that is, the testimonyfrom the three trial witnesses, was included in the original record on appeal just narrative. on the night of december 11 and morning of december 12, 1982, the defendant, joseph must establish (1) a 'nexus' between the judge's corruption or criminal conduct in other cases and the defendant's judicial corruption claims should be resolved at an evidentiary hearing. judge bertucci allegations, taken as true, establish that he was deprived of this basic right at his trial, and he is based on this information. the basis for the defendant's argument that counsel should have re-opened the motion to suppress, the idea of bribing maloney but that the defendant was unable to gather the necessary funds. to reverse the circuit court's dismissal of the defendant's corruption claim and conflict-of-interest claim ¶ 19 "[a] [defendant] who alleges that his trial judge's corruption violated his right to a fair trial take adequate protective steps, or where the court was not apprised and the defendant can show that plainly in his petition that counsel did not inform him of the nature of the representation of the defendant gacho: no, i don't. and decided on direct appeal are barred by res judicata and those claims that could have been raised, defendant gacho: yes. defendant and de wulf followed them in de wulf's car. during the drive, the defendant explained ______________________________________________________________________________ titone, the defendant raised specific allegations tying maloney's interest in titone's case to a bias family. (use reverse side if needed) for appellant: michael j. pelletier, state appellate defender & alan d. goldberg, of imprisonment for life. cars stopped, and the defendant told de wulf that he and she were waiting to hear gunshots. she 1997], and that [was] the only petition that the court need[ed] to address." although it contested corruption, and he indicated that the parties should conduct discovery on both the corruption claim asserted in his pro se postconviction petition that his trial counsel concurrently represented a family as it is included in the current record. thus, the state argues, the defendant could have raised this all of the claims in the defendant's initial petition. it reiterated the above three claims, except that this corruption deprived him of his right to a fair trial. the encounter, the defendant and titone forced infelise and fratto at gunpoint to be bound, then any such hearing may affect the strength of the defendant's allegations in unforeseeable ways, we do defense counsel in each case had a tie to a person or entity *** which would benefit from an maloney got two out of three" of the three co-defendants, "it would be enough;" that is, "as long as of interest. regarding the conflict-of-interest allegation, the defendant stated in his petition that his eventuallyto this appeal. in that 46-page document, the defendant asserted, among other things, that ¶16 theactprovidesameansbywhichadefendantmaychallengehis convictionfor “substantial the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the state in its argument conceded that the allegations in the petition, liberally construed in light of the trial record, fail to make a substantial gaultney, 174 ill.2d at 418. at the second stage, the petition may be dismissed “when the court, and we would reject such a contention in any event. as the defendant observes in his brief, of one of the victims divided his loyaltyandgavehim incentive to disregard the defendant's interests. opinion (front sheet to be attached to each opinion) defendant gacho: yes, sir. title "[a]fter being convicted, [counsel] informed [the defendant] that, 'he was still handling some legal well-pleaded facts in the petition and in any accompanying affidavits are taken as true.” people v. defendant. while she was there, she said, police questioned her aggressively. she said that she appellate court of illinois fatallyshot the two victims. the defendant, titone, and sorrentino subsequentlydivided moneyand member of one of the victims, labored under a conflict of interest. for the reasons that follow, we in the physical abuse and because he wanted his wife to be set free. the defendant was impeached on cross 2012 il app (1st) 091675 a fair trial is a basic component of due process. regardless of whether maloney could have been maloney. accordingly, the state argues, "it is completely unclear how maloney could have attorney's prior or contemporaneous association with either the prosecution or the victim." ) robert gacho, ) honorable argument on direct appeal and should be barred from doing so now. the hon. diane canon , judge(s) presiding. john doe, of attorneys of counsel. indicate the word none if not represented. first judicial district clear and true between the state and the accused denies the latter due process of law.' " hawkins, 181 this allegation, taken as true, is strong evidence of counsel's divided loyalty. in total, then, the he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to re-open his motion to promises to "fix" trials. it further alleged that dino titone, the co-defendant whose bench trial was conduct." people v. fair, 193 ill. 2d 256, 261, 738 n.e.2d 500 (2000) (citing people v. titone, 151 maloney's corruption tainted the trial of dino titone, a co-defendant in this case. the state argues, second stage advances to the third stage, at which an evidentiary hearing is held. see ill. rev. stat. court no. 1-09-1675 can prove that the trial judge had a personal interest in the outcome of the trial." fair, 193 ill. 2d the people of the state of illinois, ) appeal from the accepted a bribe in titone's case with the idea that he could conceal his perfidy by ensuring that sentenced to death, and he appealed his conviction and sentence directly to the supreme court. see (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney, who also represented a family 9 the defendant's counsel had, in the past, represented a family member of tullio infelise. the court vacated his sentence on direct appeal. 122-1). on appeal, the defendant argues that his petition should not have been dismissed, because ill. const. art. vi, § 4(b); ill. sup. ct. r. 603 (eff. july 1, 1971). the supreme court affirmed the postconviction petition. because it could have been raised on direct appeal. as the state points out, "[p]ostconviction claims attorney. this claim was supported by an affidavit from titone's father, who described a scheme in procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judgeto forget the burden crimes, and have his children taken away from her, if he did not confess. the defendant recalled ______________________________________________________________________________ actual conflict might have had on the defendant's trial. we hold only that the defendant's allegations status hearings, the defendant's new counsel appeared before judge diane g. cannon. on that date, no. 1-09-1675 appeal." people v. sanders, 238 ill. 2d 391, 398, 939 n.e.2d 352 (2010). "claims that were raised go free." although maloney ultimately found titone guilty and sentenced him to death, titone's of this waiver argument, the state raises two points. v. gacho, 122 ill. 2d 221, 522 n.e.2d 1146 (1988). on remand, the defendant was sentenced to evidentiary support for this allegation, in the form of an affidavit from titone's father, who detailed no. 1-09-1675 ¶ 1 the defendant, robert gacho, appeals from the circuit court's second-stage dismissal of his of the defendant's girlfriend, katherine de wulf. the state's evidence produced the following judge's conduct at [the defendant's] trial; and (2) actual bias resulting from the judge's extrajudicial no. 1-09-1675 jury, not maloney, and she noted that the defendant cited no suspect rulings maloney might have ¶14 thesupplementalpetition assertedthatthedefendant's pre-trialcounselapproachedhim with (give month, day and year) coleman, 183 ill.2d at 381. “in determining whether to grant an evidentiary hearing, all began crying, and, as she cried, police walked the defendant by her room so that she and he could entitled to a forum to vindicate this right. for that reason, we agree with the defendant that the corruption. , dissent. ) circuit court of ¶ 7 as he had at the hearing on his motion to suppress, the defendant testified at trial that police not show prejudice in order to secure a reversal of his conviction. spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d at 15. v. ) no. 83 c 127 ¶ 20 on the first prong, the state concedes that maloney was corrupt, and it further concedes that mother-in-law, edna haynes. edna haynes testified that she and two of her children, timothy and suppress his confession after witnesses testified that the confession had been physicallycoerced; and defendant's postconviction allegations regarding his counsel make a substantial showing of a and slapped him around a little bit so he would talk," while another police officer suggested that assistance. see u.s. const. amend vi; strickland v. washington, 466 u.s. 668 (1984). he argues judge cases in which he or she has an interest in the outcome." hawkins, 181 ill. 2d at 50. " 'every ¶ 22 the state argues that the defendant's corruption claim must fail because he cites no particular defendant's convictions may be reversed if the trial court was informed of the problem and failed to conflict claim. the defendant now appeals to argue that the circuit court erred in dismissing his which includes a transcript of the defendant's waiving any conflict issues, belied the defendant's did not interject. justices karnezis and rochford concurred in the judgment and opinion. matter for ross infelise,' " but the defendant stated in his affidavit that counsel never apprised him regarding [your attorney's] representation of a family member of one of the victims here? discussed aspects of his representation of [the defendant] with the infelise family' " but that counsel assertions that merely amount to conclusions are not sufficient to warrant a hearing under the act. shewasundertakinginvestigation. theprosecutor,whohadlitigatedthecasebeforejudgebertucci, " 'an actual conflict of interest adversely affected' counsel's performance." spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d at motion to dismiss thedefendant's amendedpetition. atthe beginning of thathearing,thedefendant's conclude that the defendant has pled sufficient facts to support his claim of a conflict. even without that maloneyhas been shown to have accepted bribes to fix murder cases. the defendant argues that examination by the facts that he did not raise these allegations to people who interviewed him and smith & smith, 11 ¶ 18 "a fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process." people v. hawkins, 181 13 claim that trial counsel labored under a conflict of interest. we remand this matter to the circuit ______________________________________________________________________________ that counsel should have moved to re-open his motion to suppress after three trial witnesses testified evidentiary hearing, the allegations in the petition must be supported by the record or by see one another. the defendant testified that police slapped him and struck him in his injured kidney ¶ 32 second, the state offers that we cannot determine the level of counsel's conflict without a for appellants, indicate if attorney represents appellants or appellees and include for post-conviction relief. in open court, counsel explained that the petition was intended to ¶ 12 in april 1999, the defendant's post-conviction counsel withdrew his representation due to a not now resolve the questions of whether counsel suffered from a per se conflict, or what effect an attorney represented "a member of the infelise family," ross infelise, at the same time counsel describes something short of a per se conflict. see sprietzer, 123 ill. 2d at 17-18. in such cases, a ¶ 33 for the foregoing reasons, we affirm the circuit court's dismissal of the defendant's claim that the act are divided into three distinct stages. people v. gaultney, 174 ill.2d 410, 418, 675 n.e.2d as they questioned him. he also said that police told him they would charge his wife with the 14 from doing so now. agreed that an evidentiary hearing should be held to resolve the defendant's charges of judicial impermissible attorney conflicts of interest. see people v. spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d 1. plaintiff-appellee, ) cook county. member of one of the victims and "discussed aspects of his representation" of the defendant with the defendant directly alleged that counsel admitted having discussed his case with the infelise family. we agree that the nature of the relationship might bear on the intensity of counsel's conflict, we on the ground that police had physically and psychologically coerced it. at the hearing, the more specific description of the nature of ross infelise's familial relationship to the victim. while "the court: mr. gacho, are you aware of all these circumstances that are being according to edna haynes, one police officer admitted to her that police had "scared [the defendant] supplement the defendant's original pro se petition, not previous counsel's amended petition. the 7 second stage, as occurred here, is reviewed de novo. people v. whitfield, 217 ill.2d 177, 182, 840 ¶ 4 prior to the defendant's trial, one of the prosecuting attorneys pointed out on the record that ) diane canon, [that] engender, by themselves, a disabling conflict" (emphasis in original), usually "the defense supplemental petition noted that maloney had been convicted of accepting bribes in exchange for the state does not repeat the circuit court's reasoning that the defendant waived this conflict in open "is new evidence not on the record." however, we do not see, nor does the defendant explain, why sorrentino and titone, met the victims at the defendant's home to consummate a drug deal. during ineffective assistance by failing to move to re-open the motion to suppress after seeing a police ¶ 3 the evidence at the defendant's trial was detailedin the supreme court's decision on his direct cook county; the appeal from the circuit court of cook county. (maloney): make a substantial showing of an impermissible conflict whose contours may be defined in further who recalled that the defendant asked her for funds to fix his case. the petition made no mention appellants and/or marie q. czech and william l. toffenetti, assistant state's seeing his wife crying as police questioned her. he said that he signed a confession to stop the knowing ross infelise's relationship to the victim, we know that counsel owed a duty of loyalty to however, that there is no "nexus" between maloney's corruption and the defendant's own case. we thatdefendantcouldhaveraisedthis ineffective assistance claim in his direct appeal, and he is barred 12 justices father speculated in his affidavit that maloney reneged on their deal out of fear that the scheme he argues that counsel labored under a per se conflict, because his representation of a familymember circuit court erred in dismissing his postconviction claims regarding maloney's judicial corruption. appellees. attorneys, of counsel. ill. 2d 19, 30-31, 600 n.e.2d 1160 (1992)). here, the defendant's allegations and supporting "informed [his] trial counsel a week before she testified at trial that [police] admitted" their physical to de wulf that the group planned to "waste" the victims. after driving for less than an hour, the which the attorney would give the money to a "bagman" named "mcgee," who would then pass the of the nature of the legal matter. in his petition, the defendant also asserted that his counsel provided following form: presiding justice hoffman delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. money to maloney. titone's father further attested that the attorney told them "that as long as in fact, based on matters outside the record, because he now alleges that one of the witnesses opinion filed gave him medical treatment after his confession, and the state adduced testimony from police chicago. ¶ 11 in december 1998, after many continuances, the circuit court held a hearing on the state's at which an indigent defendant is entitled to appointed counsel, the petition may be amended, and ¶ 34 affirmed in part and reversed in part; cause remanded. and the claim that the defendant's trial counsel labored under a conflict of interest. judge bertucci first division the record as it existed on direct appeal. further, it must be inferred from the contents of the three did not tell the defendant the precise substance of those conversations. the defendant added that, no. 1-09-1675 also add attorneys disagree. indeed, it is difficult to conceive how maloney's misconduct in titone's trial did not also counsel agreed when judge robert bertucci, who was then presiding over the case, stated that it was that trial counsel improperly labored under a conflict of interest. as noted above, the defendant same reasons they satisfy the first prong: they demonstrate maloney's interest in ensuring that the court for an evidentiary hearing on these two claims, to determine if either or both entitle the no. 1-09-1675 report that the defendant believed undercut evidence that tuillo infelise inculpated him. for his no. 1-09-1675 then set the matter for a further status hearing. ¶ 23 the defendant's second argument on appeal is that his trial counsel provided him ineffective ¶ 6 at the defendant's trial, the state's theory of the case was supported by, among other things, it made a substantial showing that (1) he was denied a fair trial due to his trial judge's corruption; no. 1-09-1675 5 means that the defendant did not receive a trial before an impartial tribunal. the defendant's ¶ 21 to satisfy the second prong of the above test, a defendant "need not prove actual bias if he witnesses' testimony, and the questions trial counsel asked to adduce that testimony, that counsel 3 it did not include a claim that the defendant's appellate counsel had been ineffective. ¶ 17 the defendant's first argument on appeal is that his postconviction claims of judicial bias gaultney, 174 ill.2d at 418. if not summarily dismissed, the petition proceeds to the second stage, victim's family. no. 1-09-1675 645 (7th cir. 1995)), and it need not be belabored here, except to say that the defendant is correct strong, and the defendant has satisfied the first prong of the test for advancing a claim of judicial (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to renew a motion to ) karnezis and rochford jj. , concur[s]. judge presiding. [the defendant and sorrentino] were found guilty, [maloney] could get away with letting [titone] subsequently sentenced to death. he was resentenced to imprisonment for life after the supreme counsel." people v. spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d 1, 13, 525 n.e.2d 30 (1988). "effective assistance means guided them to a waiting car. sorrentino and titone rode in a car with the bound victims, while the defendant-appellant. ) judge presiding. docket no. ¶ 29 the second category of conflict, often called a "potential," "possible," or "actual" conflict, circuit court of ¶ 15 on may29, 2009, in a written order, judge cannon dismissed the defendant's postconviction spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d at 14. "the justification for treating these conflicts as per se has been that the constitutional violation, and they warrant an evidentiary hearing. because the evidence adduced at 4 instances of suspect rulings at his trial, and because his guilt was determined by a jury, not by denied the defendant's motion. the case proceeded to a trial at which the defendant was tried before infect the defendant's trial. the trials were held simultaneously, concerned the same set of murders, the defendant did explain why this information was missing from his petition. the defendant stated dismiss it if it is frivolous or patently without merit. ill. rev. stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 122-2.1; his "understandingthatthere[was] an amended post-conviction petition that was filed [innovember reporter of decisions - illinois appellate court in the defendant's case. as the defendant points out in his briefs, he has alleged that maloney defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. notwithstanding the fact that the defendant's trial was simultaneous with the unfair trial given to for third party for appellee(s): anita alvarez, state's attorney, of chicago. alan j. spellberg, 6 appeal from the lower court and trial judge(s) in form indicated in margin: no. 1-09-1675 of chicago. claims. on the corruption claims, judge cannon reasoned that the defendant was convicted by a showing of a constitutional violation.” people v. hall, 217 ill.2d 324, 334 (2005). a postconviction ¶ 10 postconviction counsel was eventually appointed for the defendant, and counsel filed an documents, taken as true, emphatically establish both prongs of the above test. the defendant's confession; information given to police by infelise before he died; and the testimony drugs they obtained from the victims. made in his case. regarding the conflict-of-interest issue, judge cannon found that the record, please use the the people of the state of illinois, kidnaping for his part in the killing of two men, tullio infelise and aldo fratto. the defendant was counsel's representation of ross infelise, and the state argues that the defendant was required at least for appellees, chicago. john koltse, assistant appellate defender, of counsel. merited a third-stage evidentiary hearing. maloney's pattern of judicial corruption is well- the court: and you have discussed it in detail with your attorney? defendant's wife testified that she went to the police station while they were interrogating the referred to and discussed now? maloney's scheme in titone's case. the nexus between maloney's corruption and this case is very officers saying that they did not abuse the defendant. at the conclusion of the hearing, maloney at 263. we conclude that the defendant's allegations, taken as true, satisfy this second prong for the represented the defendant. the defendant further stated that counsel told the defendant that " 'he coerced his inculpatory statement by physical violence. he also presented testimony from his unfavorable verdict for the defendant." spreitzer, 123 ill. 2d at 16. in such cases, the defendant need ¶ 9 in february 1991, the defendant filed his first pro se post conviction petition, which led ill. 2d at 51 (quoting tumey v. ohio, 273 u.s. 510, 532 (1927)). ill. 2d 41, 50, 690 n.e.2d 999 (1998) (citing bracy, 520 u.s. 899). "fairness at trial requires not 10 ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the defendant added that his appellate counsel was would be uncovered. the defendant's petition observed that titone had been granted a new trial ¶ 13 on july 30, 2008, the defendant's new post-conviction counsel filed a supplemental petition petition, filed pursuant to the post conviction hearing act (act) (ill. rev. stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. ¶ 25 in reply to the state's waiver argument, the defendant notably does not assert that appellate ¶ 30 here, the defendant alleges alternativelythat both forms of conflict were present here. first, ineffective for failing to raise the claims on direct appeal. no. 1-09-1675 the court: and you wish him to continue as your lawyer, is that correct? suppress. however, we reverse the trial court's dismissal of his judicial corruption claim and his 2 at 50 (citing in re murchison, 349 u.s. 133, 136 (1955)). "to this end, no person is permitted to maloney's corruption had deprived him of a fair trial and that his counsel labored under a conflict documented (see eg., bracy v. gramley, 520 u.s. 899 (1997); united states v. maloney, 71 f. 3d assistance by an attorney whose allegiance to his client is not diluted by conflicting interests or but his postconviction claim is based on counsel's continued representation of ross infelise. in lieu support this claim, the defendant attached his own affidavit, as well as an affidavit from a relative the state may answer or move to dismiss the petition. ill. rev. stat. 1991, ch. 38, pars. 122-4, 122-5; april 16 , 2012 no. 1-09-1675 counsel informed the court that the defendant's case was not set for an evidentiary hearing and that defendants-appellant. no. 1-09-1675 appellate court of illinois ¶ 24 in response, the state argues that the defendant has waived or forfeited this argument, and remand for further proceedings on those issues. we affirm the circuit court's dismissal of the ineffectiveness claim is that the trial testimony of the three witnesses should have prompted counsel 18 (quoting cuyler v. sullivan, 446 u.s. 335, 350 (1980)). n.e.2d 859 (1997). except in cases where the death penalty has been imposed, proceedings under the court: and you have no objection to whatever has occurred in the past of the defendant's pro se claim of trial counsel's conflict of interest. ¶ 8 following the trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict against the defendant, and he was coercion. the defendant argues that "the fact that trial counsel knew" of this testimony prior to trial


All Content © 2007-2012 The Judicial View, L.L.C. All Right Reserved.
About The Judicial View ®  | Privacy Policy   |  Terms of Use   |  Contact Us  |  Advertise